I was looking through twitter just now and noticed that AnimeAlmanac had changed his icon pic. He now has an image saying to boycott the Anime News Network.
Initially I figured they’d done some heinous crime (such as buy shares in CrunchyRoll) to deserve this hate. So I asked, and was shocked to find it all stems from them doing reviews of the current seasons anime.
Scott feels that they’re promoting piracy by saying if a show is good or bad, if it’s worth watching etc etc.
That to me says Scott feels that anyone who reads those reviews is definitely going to go and download them illegally. Never mind that almost all of the seasons releases are already available on Crunchy, and that Crunchy plans to have the entire seasons releases up shortly.
To me this is just pure idiocy. ANN is a news site that focuses on bring news of anime and manga related stuff to the west. Just because it’s not legally available here doesn’t mean it cant be talked about or reviewed.
Does their review of unlicensed anime increase piracy? I don’t buy it, if that was true then no company would review or talk about a series until it was officially licensed and released. For example, the new Blood movie was being reviewed and discussed on several sites (both professional and fan) long before the movie was officially (or unofficially) announced as being licensed. As have many other titles, both anime and manga, in the past.
To take what Scott is saying, ANN would have to cease reporting anything about anime or manga that isn’t legally available in the US. Most of their sources aren’t technically legally available in the US. They get their information from magazine, newspapers, websites and blogs. All of which originate in Japan, and were meant for the japanese. So technically be reporting any of that they’re promoting piracy.
Of course I can hear the argument the ‘x’ magazine or newspaper can be bought in the US. However that doesn’t mean it’s legally available. All it means is that it can be imported or viewed. It’s the same here in the UK. There are several American newspapers available that aren’t officially legally available, but are imported.
The whole thing is a very fine line IMO. As an anime site they have a right to review anime as it comes out. Journalists frequently break laws and rules to get stories, and TBH I don’t see this as any different.
If they cross the line and start saying yes series x is amazing, and you can download the raw/fansub at x site, then they’ve crossed the line.
Ultimately though I don’t see the issue, if anything I see them doing reviews like that as a bonus to the industry as it can be argued it will bring more series into the lime light and thus more likely to be licensed and released.
It’s also worth noting that ANN is not purely an american site (which Scott seems to believe). While it’s true that they work predominantly with american distributors, they also work with british and australian distributors as well. So in a multinational site, saying they should only review stuff available in the US, is a bit weird to me. Especially since there are titles only available in the UK and not in the US, as well only available in Oz or the Us.

October 15, 2009 @ 21:02.
I agree completely. And a boycott on ANN now is silly, as they have been doing a new season anime preview for years. A quick google in their site came up with a Summer 2003 anime preview guide! This is not new by any means. If they were linking to illegal download sites it would be a different story entirely. with the advent of a significant number of simulcasts the new Japanese season is more relevant than ever. So I have no problem with it.
Gricomet´s last blog ..Gricomet: Saki ep. 14: This show is so delightfully ridiculous. Saki’s round should be crazy as well next episode. #anime